Since 1945, views concerning
the problems of development and underdevelopment have undergone numerous and
sometimes drastic changes. Such changes occurred both in developed and
underdeveloped countries. The primary purposes of this chapter is to describe
and explain these changes, especially those that have taken place in the
economically advanced societies.
The problem is that at
particular points in time views on development and underdevelopment have not
always been the same in all industrialized countries. Europeans are more aware
of the great disparities in today’s troubled world and appear better informed
about the causes of underdevelopment.
The period 1945-1985 is
divided into four ten-year periods. This periodization is an arbitrary one and
that there are no well-defined “boundaries” separating one period from another.
I. 1945-1955:
Period of Western Disconcern
In this period, developed
countries were not interested yet with the problem of underdevelopment
countries. The term ‘underdevelopment’ and ‘Third World’ had not been coined.
Most of developed countries were focus on their own problems, to recover from
damage that occurred because of the World War II.
Also at this period, Western
countries faced the spread of communism in Europe and later in Asia, where the
Chinese revolution of 1949 and followed by the Korean War (1950 – 1952). The
United States adopted General Marshall’s plan in 1947 to stop the spread of
communism and also to speed up the recovery of Western Europe, by providing
huge reconstruction aid to its European Allies.
The colonial powers, such as
Belgium, France, the Netherlands, Portugal, and the United Kingdom, are the
only countries which showed some interest to what is now called Third World
countries. This interest was only to protect their interests as best as they
could, because they faced with demands for independence by their overseas
dependencies. They were more concerned about losing their investments, cheap
resources and employment opportunities than in Third World problem in poverty,
illiteracy, unemployment, and malnutrition. Western scholars also showed little
interest on problems of other country’s colonies.
II. 1955-1965:
Period of Optimism and High Expectation
In this period, there were
many independence movement in Asia and Africa which followed by the end of
colonial era. The Third World received considerable attention, both from
developed and underdeveloped countries. They believed that they should help the
poor countries that left behind to catch up with the rich countries.
The developments of the new
independent countries were accompanied by a large increase in the international
organizations (mostly UN), many of which collected and disseminated a wealth
information on Third World countries. The growing number of independent states,
resulting in a vast expansion of world diplomatic relation. After become
independent, Third World countries joined UN and enabling them to bring their
development problems and need for aid to the attention of all developed
countries.
By 1955, Japan and Europe
had fully recovered from war devastation and were beginning to experience
greater prosperity than ever before. From this experiences, the Third World
countries assumed that they could be developed in a short time period. The rich
countries were prepared to provide financial aid and send technicians to get
the development process underway.
As a consequences of
decolonization process in 1955-1965, the Third World had high expectation and
euphoria as they had become independent states which could plan their own
future and promote their own interest. It should be clear from above that
around 1960 it was common to think that the only thing the less-advanced
countries had to do was to follow the footsteps of the industrialized
countries.
III. 1965-1975:
Period of Growing Scepticism
The optimistic mood of the
late 1950s and early 1960s begun to dissipate around 1963 and had disappeared
altogether by 1965. The Third World countries had complained, at the newly
created UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) in Geneva 1964, about
nature of aid programs and had expressed dissatisfaction about unfavourable
trade condition. These developments set the stage for a period of growing
scepticism and uncertainty regarding the process of development. The United Nations Development Decade at
Midpoint, a 1965 UN publication, stated that the fact that the most Third
World countries were making very little progress.
Industrial growth was
concentrated in a limited number of large cities, resulting an alarming decline
in employment opportunities at the rural areas. The result was a large number
of rural families migrated to the cities. Another consequence was the
abandoning of farmland, which lead to food shortages. Every year, prospect for
development for all Third World countries were becoming smaller and causing several
donor countries to cut back their aid programs.
Starting around 1965, there
was highly critical towards the approach of development. Older Marxist theories
of imperialism were revived and adapted to formulate the ‘dependency
perspective’. As a consequences of the critical writings, many new term and
concepts came to dominate the development literature.
It is clear that between
1962-1972 there was a dramatic turnabout in the way many European and North
American development experts perceived problem of development in the Third
World. Some lesson learned, such as complex process, diversity among Third
World and entrepreneurial ability, were summarized in this period development.
IV. 1975-1985:
Period of Pessimism and Reevaluation
In this period, informed people
everywhere knew that there is still a huge gap between rich and poor countries,
and that living conditions in the poorest countries were deteriorating. In
1974, the Third World countries demanded the creation of New International
Economic Order (NIEO), based on the principles of equity, equality of all
sovereign states, interdependence, common interests, and worldwide cooperation.
Since 1973, the world has
been plagued by a host of problems: high energy costs, high rates of inflation,
unemployment, economic stagnation, high interest rates, and rapidly growing
indebtedness, especially in the Third World. In 1982, debts were accumulating
faster than they were being paid off.
As a consequence of economic
recession, some of rich countries were reluctance to provide development aid.
Another consequence of the recession was the rising tide of protectionism in
the industrialized countries. The global crisis has reduce the prospects for
development, which make this period named pessimism. The debt problem is
particularly disconcerting. The world economic system may become paralyzed if
the Third World fail to pay their debt.
Variety of urban problems
become one of the Third World countries’ concern. For instance, rapidly
expanding shantytowns (slums) and widespread underemployment in the ‘informal’
tertiary sector.
Many experts have searched
for alternative strategies to rise the quality of life in most Third World
countries. Around 1976, the ‘basic needs’ approach become fashionable. It aims
to assure every human being of having access to the necessities of life.
Attention is focused on the rural areas. Attempts are made to stimulate the
processing of agricultural products in villages. This strategy might not work
because the Third World were concerned of the disadvantages as it would reduce
industrial investment opportunities.
A variant of the approach is
that of collective self-reliance.
This strategy entails a form of loosely integrated economic development by a
number of neighbouring countries. An example is CARICOM, or Caribbean
community. One favourable aspect of collective self-reliance is the larger
common market.
Over the year, the
objectives of economic aid programs have undergone drastic changes. Objectives
will continue to modified, depending on past experiences, definitions and
theories of development, request of aid by the recipient countries, and the
donor countries’ motivations.
Since development is
an extraordinary complex process, it is no easy task to come up with an
appropriate development strategy or aid program. Development is not something
that should be left up to engineers and economies. Other fields also have
responsibility too. Just one particular theory cannot explain underdevelopment
everywhere, so geographic differentiation precludes that one single model of
socioeconomic development can solve underdevelopment everywhere. Tugas kuliah Teori Pembangunan, lumayan kalau bisa dishare. Ini dari Buku The Third World in Perspective, karangan H. A. Reitsma dan J. M. G. Kleinpenning.
Komentar
Posting Komentar